If you already have some success with women, but don’t get consistent results, this isn’t for you. You get that. A lot of success. Some types of women but not others.

The reason is that. This is what it is. The product is a dating strategy. . Basic approaching and attracting women skills are required in order to use it. It’s not like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it’s like it It is high on theory and low on implementation. It’s difficult to implement unless you know a lot and can use the theoretical ideas to figure it out for yourself.

Let’s get into the product…

Does the System Make Sense and is it Realistic?

Some of the major differences between women are captured by Vin DiCarlo and Brian Burke.

1. Do these dimensions map to reality of women? Pretty good. I did the exercise of classifying all of my girlfriends and it was useful for around 80% of them. For the 20% I had trouble with they were pretty unique personalities and not from the U.S.
2. Will the dimensions help you to understand women’s behaviors better? Yes.
3. Now, the real test. Will you get better results if you adapt your behaviors to women who differ on these dimensions? Yes.

This system is useful to understand and think about when you are meeting women. It’s not perfect, but it’s pretty good and with practice could make a big difference to your results and the types of women you are able to get and keep.

Weaknesses of System to Be Aware of

A Gap in the System – Self Esteem

I was surprised that there was no mention of self esteem or confidence in the system. This is one of the major differences that I have seen in women that has helped me calibrate my behaviors to them. It is one of the most important things I have learned over the years, and it has an important role to play in relationships. There is a real gap in the system from my point of view. It would have taken the system to a whole new level, but perhaps the complexity would be too difficult to teach. To make sense of it? I don’t understand why it would be left out.

Cross-Cultural Applications

Vin DiCarlo and Brian Burke’s system is based on a comprehensive view of what they have seen and experienced in the U.S. The guidelines are still relevant despite the system not capturing the extremes involved. This is something to keep in mind.

Not so Hot in Implementation

The product’s weakness is in implementation.

1. “The Profiler Quiz”: A short 9 question multiple choice that you can run through for a girl you want to know the type of. At the end it gives you some summary analysis of the girl’s type. I ran it for a range of girls and sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn’t. For me it wasn’t consistent and it was much more effective to just think about the girl and decide what she was based on her behavior.
2. Pop Quiz This test is supposed to see if you can figure out the personality types of women based on some behaviors. In practice, this was made super simple so that it really doesn’t help. It basically repeats behaviors they’ve spoken about being relevant to types and then takes it to extremes to make it really easy for you to identify.
3. The Ultimate Strategy Guide: Disappointing…

Disappointing Ultimate Strategy Guide

Many of the tips given to you in the Ultimate Strategy Guide part of the course are relevant to all women. This is not true. It is advice that you should follow no matter the woman.

1. “The main mistake guys make with this type of woman is LOOKING at their hand when touching her. Do not do this. She will immediately see you as trying to sneak a touch in.”
2. “Don’t be afraid to laugh at yourself.”
3. “The best way to have great body language is to a) relax your body, b) look happy.”
4. “Remember that with a [personality type A] she can’t think that you are with her just for sex.”

I found the advice confusing and not well thought out. It says that in one of the worst examples. When women get dressed up, drink a little alcohol, and go into a dance setting, they almost all turn into TDI-playettes.

One of their 8 personality types is the TDI-Playettes. The whole value of their system seemed to be undermined by this point.

If it was true, the system would be less useful. The insights into the different behaviors of women are relevant in bars all the time. Their insights are more relevant than the statement would suggest.

There is a summary. Vin and Brian were trying too hard to make women sound different in this important chapter of the course. If it had been simpler, it would have been more useful and valuable. It is not always better to have complexity.

Over-zealous Marketing, Building the Product Up

There are high expectations for the results you can get from this system in the sales video for the program. If you want a magic bullet. Easy results with no effort. You are going to be disappointed. The first dating system that personalizes your approach to different women claims that there are no secret words that will attract the women of your dreams. It was actually the first. It is possible to date to Relating. It was published in 2007. As you can see from our review of Dating to Relating, Pandora’s Box is more useful and effective.

The marketing continues in the actual product.

There is a review of principles covered in Vin DiCarlo’s first book in the first four parts. The code of attraction. Marketing and building up a product. This is one of the reasons why this product has a low service rating. This overly-commercial focus of the content is not what the product is about. It’s unreasonable to have to read through a lot of marketing when you don’t pay a high price point.

If you have yet to read. The code of attraction. There will be some new content that will be less noticeable for you. If you have, you may be able to find yourself reading quickly through all these chapters, scanning the pages for something interesting, which doesn’t happen very often.

The marketing from Chapter 5 onwards doesn’t seem to make much of a difference, although it does make the odd appearance in the form of telling you a concept like Threading would be useful to use in a particular situation, and then telling you you can learn it in a bootcamp

Customer Service Complaints (Now Fixed)

We contacted DiCarlo Diclassified and were satisfied that they had dealt with the people who came up against customer service issues.

They said that there were some big issues at the beginning because of the popularity of the product, but they had now been solved. They increased the capacity of their server and customer service team to deal with the increased demand. We haven’t had any more complaints since then.

The Bottom Line

If you are new to dating advice, look at a beginner’s option to get started with the foundations of attraction and women psychology. If you already have the skills to meet and attract women, have become aware of women’s social cues, and are getting sporadic success, then you may be ready for Pandora’s Box. Your time will be better spent learning from other products if you don’t.

If not complete, the ideas on different personality types are useful. This will get you started on thinking on a new level and help you take your game to a higher level for those at an advanced level.

The guidelines are shaky. There is a mixture of good advice that makes sense, some confusing advice, and some generic guidelines that are relevant for all women. This is a reason why this product should only be looked at by guys of an advanced level.